Start with the right cell.
Confirm the controller, available L5X export, process boundary, and access authority. Set up the evidence and agree on the five scenarios.
THE PLC FIRST RESPONSE PILOT
One machine.
A more capable team.
Ninety days to put cited fault tracing and field verification to work on one of your control cells.
The current Rockwell-first pilot. RESTART recovery and machine-health workflows are scoped separately.
A CLEAR SCOPE FROM THE START
Agree on what good
looks like.
Choose five fault questions your team actually faces. A controls engineer reviews the scenarios. Your technicians work through the evidence and verify the result.
- One qualified, non-safety-critical Rockwell control cell
- ControlLogix or CompactLogix L5X export
- A plant-specific workspace and 2–5 technician accounts
- Five engineer-reviewed acceptance scenarios
- Mobile Field Check, incident history, and a final report
HOW THE NINETY DAYS WORK
Learn from the machine.
Leave with the evidence.
Put it beside your team.
Technicians use the workspace for the pilot cell. Read-only field checks add observations, while scheduled engineer review addresses unresolved questions.
Make the next call from results.
Review what the system answered, what remained unknown, and what your team verified. Keep the incident history and final report either way.
FIT MATTERS
A focused starting point.
A pump skid, conveyor section, or packaging machine with an obtainable L5X export and a team willing to use the workflow.
- Safety PLCs, safety-instrumented systems, burner management, and protective-relay settings are outside this pilot.
- No controller connection, production writes, forces, or safeguard bypasses.
- Customer authority and the site’s approved work procedures remain in place.
- Any continuation is discussed separately. Nothing renews automatically.
RESTART · MACHINE-HEALTH PILOT
The motor belongs
in the same picture.
Add a scoped evaluation of saved vibration measurements alongside manuals, service history, and recovery records.
Explore the proposed workflow →- One agreed motor or rotating asset, with usable measurements and operating context.
- A defined baseline, comparison questions, and technician-reviewed acceptance criteria.
- Evidence-backed indications, competing explanations, and follow-up measurements.
- Read-only analysis of supplied records. No autonomous replacement or production control.
Separate scope and quote. Sensor supply, data collection, model placement, and integration are agreed before kickoff. This proposed evaluation is not included in the $24,000 PLC pilot, and the public preview is not a deployed diagnostic service.
Bring us one machine.
A short qualification conversation is the first step. No confidential logic files are needed in the initial inquiry.
Check my machine’s fit →